skip to main content
Meeting Agenda
I. Opening of the Meeting
I.A. Welcome
I.B. Roll Call
I.C. Pledge of Allegiance
I.D. Approval of Agenda
II. Communications, Petitions and Delegations
III. Move into Close Session
III.A. Attorney Client Priviledged Information
III.A.1. The aforesaid section of the Open Meetings Act permits a public body to meet in a closed session to consider material exempt from discussion or disclosure by state or federal statute, or which is reasonably related thereto; provided that the scope of the discussion in closed session legitimately relates to legal matters within the common law attorney-client privilege. Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. Wyoming City Council, 168 Mich App 459, 425 NW2d 695, 1988 Mich App LEXIS 239 (1988). Opinion of counsel addressed to client comes within common law attorney-client privilege protected from disclosure under Booth Newspapers v. Regents of the Univ. of Mich., 93 Mich App 100, 286 NW2d 55, 1979 Mich App LEXIS 2406 (1979). Even this written opinion is protected by the privilege as courts have consistently held that written opinion of counsel concerning open meetings law, as involving material subject to attorney-client privilege, was exempt from public disclosure under both Booth Newspapers v. Regents of the Univ. of Mich., 93 Mich App 100, 286 NW2d 55, 1979 Mich App LEXIS 2406 (1979).
III.A.1.a. Pending Litigation
III.A.1.b. Consent Agreement Negotiations
IV. Board Comments and Announcements
V. Action Item
VI. Adjournment
VII. No Items
Agenda Item Details Reload Your Meeting
Meeting: September 3, 2013 at 4:00 PM - Closed Session
Subject:
I. Opening of the Meeting
Subject:
I.A. Welcome
Subject:
I.B. Roll Call
Subject:
I.C. Pledge of Allegiance
Subject:
I.D. Approval of Agenda
Subject:
II. Communications, Petitions and Delegations
Subject:
III. Move into Close Session
Subject:
III.A. Attorney Client Priviledged Information
Subject:
III.A.1. The aforesaid section of the Open Meetings Act permits a public body to meet in a closed session to consider material exempt from discussion or disclosure by state or federal statute, or which is reasonably related thereto; provided that the scope of the discussion in closed session legitimately relates to legal matters within the common law attorney-client privilege. Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. Wyoming City Council, 168 Mich App 459, 425 NW2d 695, 1988 Mich App LEXIS 239 (1988). Opinion of counsel addressed to client comes within common law attorney-client privilege protected from disclosure under Booth Newspapers v. Regents of the Univ. of Mich., 93 Mich App 100, 286 NW2d 55, 1979 Mich App LEXIS 2406 (1979). Even this written opinion is protected by the privilege as courts have consistently held that written opinion of counsel concerning open meetings law, as involving material subject to attorney-client privilege, was exempt from public disclosure under both Booth Newspapers v. Regents of the Univ. of Mich., 93 Mich App 100, 286 NW2d 55, 1979 Mich App LEXIS 2406 (1979).
Subject:
III.A.1.a. Pending Litigation
Subject:
III.A.1.b. Consent Agreement Negotiations
Subject:
IV. Board Comments and Announcements
Subject:
V. Action Item
Subject:
VI. Adjournment
Subject:
VII. No Items

Web Viewer